Kickoff meeting: docker containers for all components
Build a collection of consistent docker containers for the various software components involved in OpenDreamKit, making it possible to focus on writing small chunks of docker files and composing them to get various docker images and have basic dependency management.
Docker allows to stack image, but does not support “multiple inheritance”.
Possible trick: use CPP and include guards
#include "base" ... installation instructions for gap ...
GAP_full.docker: (GAP + packages + dependencies)
#include "GAP_core.docker" #include "Singular.docker" #include "...
Alternative: using a ppa / debian package
Vincent Néri (from LRI) suggested an alternative approach which might make much sense. Namely, rather than somehow reinventing a dummy packaging system with dependencies, using the standard debian package system (or that of whatever base distribution), and create a private ppa (source or binary). And then have our docker file just request the appropriate packages, knowing that dependencies will be taken care automatically.
That might actually not be too much additional work, given that:
We will be able to focus on a specific version of a specific distribution
We can afford, in a first step, to create not-so-kosher packages (e.g. a huge sage package), and to select specific versions of each packages.
And this opens the door, in the longer run, for joining forces with the tasks about creating packages for all distributions. In fact, maybe we could right now join forces with ppa:aims/sagemath handled by Jan Groenewald.
We could also get help from our debian specialist Julien (Logilab).
Single use or multiple use docker image?
Option 1: For each collection of software, build one multiple-use docker image (to be used as jupyter server, or jupyter kernel, or web service, or interactive terminal)
Option 2: Have separate images for each of those use cases
One docker container per component, or multiple component containers?
To be further discussed …
Separate container would be nice for modularity; software as a service. We would need to define some conventions for how the various components would call each other. However if two components need to communicate at C-level (libGAP, …), they need to be in the same container.
List of docker chunks we want to build:
- Core GAP
- Full GAP:
- Libraries: Linbox? MPIR?
Potential base docker images:
ubuntu + build_essentials & the like (400Mb)
Always using the same base docker image would make it easier to reduce resource consumption and composability.
Bare containers or containers with a kernel?
Do we want separate containers for MacOS / Windows, or use the same for all platforms, at the cost of embbedding a kernel that wont be used? The overhead is probably reasonably negligible.
Potential thing we may want to standardize
Each snippet should put a Jupyter kernel description (when there is such a kernel) in a standard location (see the jupyter configuration for which location we want to pick)
Standard default docker image starter with two optional parameters:
- How the image is going to be used:
- as jupyter kernel (open an appropriate port)
- as notebook server?
- as text-based interpreter
- What software to start (when relevant): GAP, Singular, … This could be snippet
- How the image is going to be used:
Existing docker images
- Dockerimage of the SPP Computeralgebra, contains GAP, Normaliz, Polymake, Singular, 4ti2: sebasguts/sppdocker
- Dockerimage for GAP and dependencies, contains GAP, PARI/GP, Polymake, Singular, 4ti2: gapsystem/gap-docker
- Official Dockerimage for Sage: sagemath/sage
- Dockerimage for Sage: cornu/docker-sage
- Dockerimage for Sage: swenson/sage